NIST researcher Emma Veley heats up a pan of bacon in the lab to see how long it takes to set off each of the 12 smoke alarms behind her on the ceiling.
Credit: R. Eskalis/NIST
Armored with safety glasses, hearing protection, and a fire-retardant lab coat, fire researcher Emma Veley carefully cradled a frying pan of raw bacon into a laboratory surrounded by wires and sensors. Mounted on the ceiling above, 12 smoke detectors waited patiently in a neat row. Veley closed the door behind her, placed the pan on a hot plate, and turned up the heat. Watching her through a large window in the next room, Amy Mensch started a timer and monitored the computer readouts that would show exactly when each alarm would "smell the bacon.”
“Modern smoke alarms are really good at detecting fires. However, they have a challenge with not detecting cooking, because cooking is almost a fire,” said Mensch, who is the lead author on a new technical report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) about how well the latest generation of smoke detectors avoids nuisance alarms. Odds are you’ve experienced one of these nuisance alarms yourself when cooking or shower steam sets off a smoke alarm. But they’re more than just annoying; they can be a real concern for fire safety.
“Studies have found that people who repeatedly have these nuisance alarms tend to disable their devices,” explained Mensch, “and when an alarm is disabled, it can’t do its main job of alerting people of a real fire.”
Raising the Standards for Smoke Alarms
If you examine the back of a smoke alarm, you should see a label saying that it ..
Support the originator by clicking the read the rest link below.
