‘Sloppy,’ ‘incompetent’ intelligence chiefs hammered for Signal chat

‘Sloppy,’ ‘incompetent’ intelligence chiefs hammered for Signal chat
Tuesday's annual "worldwide threats" hearing—intended as a discussion of China, Russia, Iran, transnational criminal organizations, and other actors—devolved instead into something closer to a criminal deposition from Law and Order, with the heads of the CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence dodging senators’ questions about their use of a commercial chat app to discuss war plans and foreign affairs—all with a journalist on the line.

The fact that officials from the White House, intelligence community, and the Pentagon were using Signal to discuss highly sensitive military activities and relations with allies, possibly on their personal devices, while traveling abroad, including to Russia, and not checking who else might have been on the in the group chat exuded “sloppiness…incompetence, disrespect,” Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., said during the hearing.



Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the vice chair of the committee, described the entire chat episode as “sloppy,” but also dangerous. 



“If the Houthis had this information they could have repositioned their defensive systems…American lives could have been lost.” 



(The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg did not reveal operational details in his article, but merely alluded to them.) The Senate Democrats’ fiery tone stood in stark contrast to the silence of Republican lawmakers who made no effort to defend, explain, or justify the affair. 



[[Related Posts]]

ODNI head Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe struggled to recall key details of the March 13-14 discussions, despite yesterday’s publication of a partial transcript, which was confirmed as authentic by a National Security Council spokesman. Gabbard initially refused to confirm that she was e ..

Support the originator by clicking the read the rest link below.